On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > We copied HACKING from libvirt but it has some bogus stuff: > neither underscore capital, double underscore, or underscore 't' suffixes > are reserved in Posix/C: this appears to be based on misreading of the > C standard. Using sane prefixes is enough to avoid conflicts. > > These rules are also widely violated in our codebase, > and it does not make sense to rework it all, apparently for > no benefit.
NACK. The benefit is improved standards compliance. One day we could find QEMU being ported to environment which conflicts with these symbols. The tiny single benefit from violating the rules would be that you could use a few additional possible classes of prefixes, in addition to the infinite combinations already available. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > --- > HACKING | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/HACKING b/HACKING > index 471cf1d..0a941fc 100644 > --- a/HACKING > +++ b/HACKING > @@ -69,10 +69,6 @@ it points to, or it is aliased to another pointer that is. > 2.3. Typedefs > Typedefs are used to eliminate the redundant 'struct' keyword. > > -2.4. Reserved namespaces in C and POSIX > -Underscore capital, double underscore, and underscore 't' suffixes should be > -avoided. > - > 3. Low level memory management > > Use of the malloc/free/realloc/calloc/valloc/memalign/posix_memalign > -- > MST
