On 08/14/2012 12:58 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > >> While we are at this, let me bring out another issue. Gluster supports 3 >> transport types: >> >> - socket in which case the server will be hostname, ipv4 or ipv4 address. >> - rdma in which case server will be interpreted similar to socket. >> - unix in which case server will be a path to unix domain socket and this >> will look like any other filesystem path. (Eg. /tmp/glusterd.socket) >> >> I don't think we can fit 'unix' within the standard URI scheme (RFC 3986) >> easily, but I am planning to specify the 'unix' transport as below: >> >> gluster://[/path/to/unix/domain/socket]/volname/image?transport=unix >> >> i,e., I am asking the user to put the unix domain socket path within >> square brackets when transport type is unix. >> >> Do you think this is fine ? > > Never saw something like this before, but it does seem reasonable to me. > Excludes ] from the valid characters in the file name of the socket, but > that shouldn't be a problem in practice.
Bikeshedding, but I prefer gluster:///path/to/unix/domain/socket:/volname/image?transport=unix as being more similar to file://, or even gluster:///path/to/unix/domain/socket/volname/image?transport=unix with the last two components implied to be part of the payload, not the path. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function