On 08/20/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > No need to expose the fd-based interface, everyone will already be fine > with the more handy EventNotifier variant. Rename the latter to clarify > that we are still talking about irqfds here.
Thanks, applied. > > -int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd(KVMState *s, int fd, int virq); > -int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd(KVMState *s, int fd, int virq); > -int kvm_irqchip_add_irq_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n, int virq); > -int kvm_irqchip_remove_irq_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n, int virq); > +int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n, int virq); > +int kvm_irqchip_remove_irqfd_notifier(KVMState *s, EventNotifier *n, int > virq); > #endif Those names aren't particularly satisfying. add_irqfd_notifier implies you want to be notified about irqfd events, but that's not what the function does. Not sure what a good name would be. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
