On 09/17/2012 08:35 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 17 September 2012 16:28, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: >> Not sure whether this is a gcc bug, but on sparc we wind up >> trying to use std to an unaligned address. The patch does >> work around the problem. > > Hmm. I guess this is guest and host having differing alignment > requirements for 64 bit types? What case does it fail on?
I'll have to re-check. I'm pretty sure this was sparc32 hosting arm-linux-user. r~
