On 09/19/2012 10:00 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > And as far as the referenced change, that has to do with "real" > branches, i.e. INDEX_op_brcond et at. Which *do* need to be > protected against retranslation. But INDEX_op_goto_tb is a > different case.
Err, well, that patch *does* change INDEX_op_goto_tb, but I think that's wrong. It should have only changed INDEX_op_brcond. r~
