Il 27/09/2012 11:03, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > On 09/24/2012 01:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > A better plan would be to incorporate this code into glib, completing > > the extremely sparse URI support that is already there. However, we > > would not be able to use it anyway, because we support compiling on old > > glib versions. > > If the same (or very similar) API is retained,
Yes, there is exactly one change in the API (modulo renaming) so we could just use some #defines or wrappers. > we could fall back on > libxml2 when glib uri parsing is unavailable. That's an interesting idea. The assumption that glib wants URI parsing is not proved, but it may work out. Paolo > Eventually we bump our > minimum version requirement and drop the libxml2 dependency (or find out > that xml has invaded our code base and we can't get rid of it).
