Il 27/09/2012 14:18, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> I think there's a problem with terminology at least. What does "paused"
> really mean? Is it that the job has been requested to pause, or that it
> has actually yielded and is inactive?
>
> The commit message seems to use the latter semantics (which I would
> consider the intuitive one),
You mean this: "Paused jobs cannot be canceled without first resuming
them". I can add a specification, like "(even if the job actually has
not reached the sleeping point and thus is still running)".
> the QMP documentation leaves it unclear,
> but the code actually implements the former semantics.
This code comment is clear:
/**
* Set to true if the job is either paused, or will pause itself
* as soon as possible (if busy == true).
*/
bool paused;
but this one can indeed use some improvement.
/**
* block_job_is_paused:
* @job: The job being queried.
*
* Returns whether the job is currently paused.
*/
bool block_job_is_paused(BlockJob *job);
>From the QMP client's point of view it doesn't really matter, does it?
- even after a job that writes to disk X has "really" paused, you cannot
read or write disk X. It's still owned by QEMU, it hasn't been flushed,
it may play games like lazy refcounts.
- what matters is that a resume undoes a pause, even if it is still
pending (which it does).
Paolo
