On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:10:28PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 09/27/2012 01:05 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > No temp_dead doesn't imply sync. temp_dead is only marking the temp as > > dead, it doesn' save it. > > Oh, duh. How did I mis-read "dead" as "save"? >
Looks like ;) -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
