On 10/09/12 12:25, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:32:05AM -0400, Don Slutz wrote:
These are modeled after x86_cpuid_get_xlevel and x86_cpuid_set_xlevel.
Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <d...@cloudswitch.com>
---
target-i386/cpu.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
index 25ca986..451de12 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
@@ -1166,6 +1166,32 @@ static void x86_cpuid_set_tsc_freq(Object *obj, Visitor
*v, void *opaque,
cpu->env.tsc_khz = value / 1000;
}
+static void x86_cpuid_get_hv_level(Object *obj, Visitor *v, void *opaque,
+ const char *name, Error **errp)
+{
+ X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(obj);
+
+ visit_type_uint32(v, &cpu->env.cpuid_hv_level, name, errp);
+}
+
+static void x86_cpuid_set_hv_level(Object *obj, Visitor *v, void *opaque,
+ const char *name, Error **errp)
+{
+ X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(obj);
+ uint32_t value;
+
+ visit_type_uint32(v, &value, name, errp);
+ if (error_is_set(errp)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (value != 0 && value < 0x40000000) {
+ value += 0x40000000;
+ }
Whats the purpose of this? Adds ambiguity.
Will add more info in this commit message.
-Don
