On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:24 PM,  <riku.voi...@linaro.org> wrote:
> From: Riku Voipio <riku.voi...@linaro.org>
>
> Currently linux-user handles system calls with a 3000+ line switch/case 
> construct
> in do_syscall(). Some syscalls are implemented inline in the switch/case, 
> others
> as separate functions, and the rest as mix of both.
>
> As the first step of the cleanup, I'd like to move implementation of each 
> syscall
> completely to their own functions. While at it, we define more standard 
> interface between
> do_syscall() and the functions implementing the system calls: system call 
> functions take
> parameter as raw abi_long, and leave the host to target errno conversion to 
> do_syscall.
>
> Once all syscall are converted to separate functions, we can convert to 
> switch/case to
> a table with syscall structs pointing to syscall implementation as well the 
> strace definitions
> currently in strace.list.
>
> Before I proceed to convert all 300+ syscalls implemented, I'd like to hear 
> if people think
> it is a good idea, or if you have some improvements to suggest. To see how it 
> would look in
> practice, here are the first five syscalls cleaned up.

I think it will be a nice cleanup. However, please fix coding style
for the affected code.

>
> Riku Voipio (5):
>   linux-user: move exit to own function
>   linux-user: move read to own function
>   linux-user: move write to own function
>   linux-user: complete do_open function isolation
>   linux-user: do_openat wrapper added
>
>  linux-user/syscall.c |  182 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>

Reply via email to