Any comments on this?, is ignoring unknown parameters to configure a feature
as I suspect to prevent build failures on users that assume that it is
autoconf based and try to enforce the defaults with an unknown option like
--enable-sdl?
Carlo
----- Forwarded message from Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:31:35 -0500
From: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] show usage and abort if unknown option is passed to configure
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
The following patch prints an error if an unknown option is passed to
configure and directs the script to show usage information.
Carlo
---
Index: configure
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/configure,v
retrieving revision 1.165
diff -u -r1.165 configure
--- configure 18 Oct 2007 20:51:48 -0000 1.165
+++ configure 23 Oct 2007 01:23:58 -0000
@@ -306,6 +303,8 @@
*) echo "undefined SPARC architecture. Exiting";exit 1;;
esac
;;
+ *) echo "ERROR: unknown option $opt"; show_help="yes"
+ ;;
esac
done
----- End forwarded message -----
