> >> If yes, but it's healed later in the series, the temporary > >> breakage still needs to be spelled out in the commit message. > > > > No, it's not healed, which is why it's mentioned in the commit > > message that future work is needed. > > I really hate "reward" submissions of tons of useful work with demands > for more even work... but here goes anyway: what's your take on > completing the job? Straightfoward, or another ton of work?
Straightforward, also because we have exactly one user of asynchronous connection (migration). But I'll let Orit do it. :) Paolo
