On 2012-10-22 15:59, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Yes, this is a know fact that this libc function doesn't have a > prototype (for instance in the manpage), that said it exists and at > least on x32 it's actually a wrapper doing things. > > That's why I think it's better to use it than doing the syscall > directly.
Well, we know that arch_prctl is not a wrapper for x86_64. And x32 will never be a concern for qemu. But I guess I can change this if you really really insist. r~
