Am 22.10.2012 13:09, schrieb n...@bytemark.co.uk: > > This is unlikely to come up now, but is a necessary prerequisite for > reconnection > behaviour. > > Signed-off-by: Nick Thomas <n...@bytemark.co.uk> > --- > block/nbd.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
What's the real requirement here? Silently ignoring a flush and returning success for it feels wrong. Why is it correct? Kevin
