On 23 October 2012 12:48, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Il 22/10/2012 19:13, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >>> > Can't we enhance qemu-tls.h to work via pthread_setspecific in case >>> > __thread is not working and use that abstraction (DECLARE/DEFINE_TLS) >>> > directly? >> Agreed. (There were prototype patches floating around for Win32 >> at least). The only reason qemu-tls.h has the dummy not-actually-tls >> code for non-linux is that IIRC we wanted to get the linux bits >> in quickly before a release and we never got round to going back >> and doing it properly for the other targets. > > Which will be "never" for OpenBSD. It just doesn't have enough support. > > Thread-wise OpenBSD is 100% crap, and we should stop supporting it IMHO > until they finish their "new" thread library that's been in the works > for 10 years or so. FreeBSD is totally ok.
It doesn't support any kind of TLS? Wow. -- PMM
