On 26.09.2012 18:56, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 26.09.2012 17:46, Anthony Liguori wrote: > [] >> This is a good example of where we need improved documentation but I >> agree 100% with Peter. > > So what do we do? > > We've a clear bug, I can only fix it in the patch to the Debian > package, since I've been asked about this bug multiple times, > and I care about our users. It is at least consistent with the > expectations. Maybe at the same time, it's a good idea to print > a warning about -nographic being deprecated, but this part should > definitely be done upstream first.
Ping? I still don't see why -nographic -daemonize makes no sence while -curses -daemonize does? (Patch for the latter has been accepted right before my patch, and even sent to -stable, but my patch is rejected without any conclusion). Let's be at least consistent and either apply both or reject both, okay? Thanks, /mjt
