On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 28 October 2012 23:48, Liu Ping Fan <pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> For those address spaces which want to be able out of big lock, they
>> will be protected by their own local.
>
> Are you sure this patch compiles? It seems to only be changing
> the prototype and implementation of address_space_init() to take
> an extra parameter, but not any of the callers...
>
The caller is in the next patch. Need to rearrange.

Thanks,
pingfan

> -- PMM
>

Reply via email to