malc <av1...@comtv.ru> writes: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 19 November 2012 18:21, malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote: >> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> +5) Files without explicit licenses fall under the GPL v2. >> > >> > I have issue with this, files without licenses are just that files >> > without licenses. >> >> If we believe this (and it seems a logical thing to believe) >> then QEMU's not distributable until we rewrite or remove or track >> down all authors for all the files without licenses... > > Yes.
That's ridiculous. There has always been a LICENSE file with a catch-all clause going back to at least 2005. If a file doesn't have an explicit LICENSE, it falls under the catch all clause. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > -- > mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
