On 20 November 2012 23:52, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) <che...@iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote:
>   When tb_remove was first commited at fd6ce8f6, there were three different
> calls pass different names to offsetof. In current codebase, the other two
> calls are replaced with tb_page_remove. There is no need to have a general
> tb_remove. Omit passing the third parameter and using tb1->phys_hash_next
> directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Wei-Ren <che...@iis.sinica.edu.tw>

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>

-- PMM

Reply via email to