Le mercredi 28 novembre 2007 à 14:24 +0000, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > Hi, > > Laurent Vivier, le Wed 28 Nov 2007 15:02:50 +0100, a écrit : > > + ret = posix_memalign((void**)&buf, 0x200, 512); > > For making this more easily portable, maybe it should be a new > qemu_memalign() function? Also, the alignment may probably be better as > a global macro, since the alignment requirements depend on the OS.
I think O_DIRECT is linux specific whereas posix_memalign() is part of
POSIX specification. And the memory alignement should only needed by the
implemetation of O_DIRECT on linux.
But I have nothing against to write a qemu_memalign().
Laurent
--
------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is
indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
