Am 04.12.2012 20:01, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:55:17PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> +static int parse_drive(DeviceState *dev, const char *str, void **ptr)
>>> +{
>>> + BlockDriverState *bs;
>>> +
>>> + bs = bdrv_find(str);
>>> + if (bs == NULL)
>>
>> Please add braces, use checkpatch.pl.
>>
>>> + return -ENOENT;
>>> + if (bdrv_attach_dev(bs, dev) < 0)
>>
>> Also here.
>
>
> This is pure code movement, and I won't introduce changes in the code
> while it is being moved to not make patch review harder.
> If you want to send coding style patches for that code after it is
> moved, be my guest.
No. Patches are required to pass checkpatch.pl (i.e., + lines in the
patch need braces). That means if not in the same patch for movement
reasons, Coding Style cleanups need to be done in advance, not as
followup. (same issue as in his AREG0 series)
Andreas
P.S. Dropping unrelated parts of the quotes makes requested changes
easier to spot. There was a ditto hidden somewhere down. ;)
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
