On 2012-12-04 15:25, Peter Maydell wrote: > So this is just a refactoring, but it prompts me to ask -- how does > this work if the PC that caused us to take this TLB fill is legitimately > zero? We seem to be overloading retaddr==0 as a "not a real cpu fault" > indicator...
Since this is a host code address, usually inside code_gen_buffer, not a target code address, this isn't ever going to happen. r~
