"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > Add sanity check to address the following concern: > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:47:22AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> All we need is the index of the request; the rest can be re-read from >> the ring.
The terminology I used here was loose, indeed. We need the head of the chained descriptor, which we already read from the ring when we gathered the request. Currently we dump a massive structure; it's inelegant at the very least. Cheers, Rusty.
