Blue Swirl wrote: > On 12/3/07, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is > > supported by the actual hardware. > > While it's not historically accurate to emulate a Sparcstation 5 with > 16 CPUs and 2 gigabytes of memory, it doesn't break anything to have > this capability.
Are you sure? OS kernels, let alone Model-specific firmware images, may well have intimate knowledge about the specific machine layout. Implementing a different machine than the one announced sounds like bad idea to me, especially when modelling an additional hypothetical machine variant in QEMU is so cheap to implement. Thiemo
