On 04/12/2007, Antti P Miettinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rick Vernam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > any comments on the current status of moving beyond dependency on GCC 3.3.6? > > Sorry for a vague ignorant question, but would the gcc-4 issues be > affected in any way if the ops were inside a big function (use labels > to find them) vs the current use of separate functions?
They might likely be affected but it would be an equally fragile and compiler-dependent solution and I think not worth putting the time it would take to adapt dyngen to this. Regards
