Am 10.12.2012 07:59, schrieb John Spencer:
the test for glibc< 2 "succeeds" wrongly for any non-glibc C library, and breaks the build on musl libc. we must first test if __GLIBC__ is defined at all, before using it unconditionally.Signed-off-by: John Spencer<maillist-q...@barfooze.de> --- user-exec.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/user-exec.c b/user-exec.c index ef9b172..cccc145 100644 --- a/user-exec.c +++ b/user-exec.c @@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ int cpu_signal_handler(int host_signum, void *pinfo, unsigned long pc; int is_write; -#if (__GLIBC__< 2 || (__GLIBC__ == 2&& __GLIBC_MINOR__<= 3)) +#if defined(__GLIBC__)&& (__GLIBC__< 2 || (__GLIBC__ == 2&& __GLIBC_MINOR__<= 3)) pc = uc->uc_mcontext.gregs[R15]; #else pc = uc->uc_mcontext.arm_pc;
Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de>
