Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> writes: > Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: >>> Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> writes: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Changes for yesterday: >>>> - Paolo Acked the series >>>> - Rebaso on top of today git (only conflicts were due to header re-shuffle) >>>> >>>> Please pull. >>>> >>>> [20121219] >>>> >>>> This is my queue for migration-thread and patches associated. This >>>> integrates review comments & code for Paolo. This is the subset from >>>> both approachs that we agreed with. rest of patches need more review >>>> and are not here. >>> >>> This breaks migration. Here's my test case: >>> >>> #!/bin/sh >>> >>> gzip -d -c lidb.ssmall.img.gz | \ >>> ~/build/qemu/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -cdrom \ >>> ~/isos/OCDC-lucid-Test-Drive-20110523_140333.iso -enable-kvm -m 2G \ >>> -incoming exec:dd >>> >>> With lidb.ssmall.img.gz being generated from a 'migrate exec:dd of=...' >>> from qemu.git just a week or two ago. >>> >>> I can't bisect tonight but can attempt to tomorrow. How has this been >>> tested? >> >> I have tested with tcp, load/not-load with guests form 4GB to 16GB RAM. >> Will test tomorrow with your test case. I didn't tested exec:, though. > > This is failing to me with master, nothing to do with the changes on > this thread. Investigating what is going on.
Master works perfectly fine for me. It only fails with your series merged in. I can bisect if you like. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Later, Juan.
