Hi,

thanks for your quick reply.

Dunrong Huang wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Erik Rull <erik.r...@rdsoftware.de> wrote:
Hi all,

which is the graphics emulation with the lowest CPU usage for 2D-only GUIs?
(e.g. Win XP without Direct3D usage)? I just need to drive a virtual
graphics display with 1024x768 (@16bit colors). At the moment I use the
cirrus graphics card emulation. Is there something more efficient?
Terminal/Console is either a real display or VNC - maybe for the two
versions different adaptors bring the best performance for each of them?

you shoud try spice. spice depends on qxl video card which is a
paravirtual graphics card.
It means you must install qxl driver in your guest to make this card work.

More details, please refer:
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/SPICE

Hi just had a look at this page - but it looks as if I cannot use this for a real hardware display:
""
Client

To connect to a virtual machine using SPICE, you need a client application.
""

Is a hardware monitor capable to display the QXL format? And for my remote clients - can I still use VNC? A change in the guest would be okay, but I still must be able to use the existing client environment...

Best regards,

Erik


Reply via email to