I did not catch that, somehow I managed to invert the logic when looking at
it. Maybe a g2h() (such a macro exist? what would be the proper method?)
around the newsp value would do it. I'll redo that this evening and attempt
to submit a newer patch. Considering I don't have direct internet access in
the VM, any suggestions to make everyone happy on the patch submission?

I might be able to redo the git setup on my mac and do it from there.

Samuel

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>wrote:

> On 2 January 2013 13:01, Samuel Seay <lightnin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The VM I did the work in doesn't have internet access and I was unsure
> how
> > to do a text only email with gmail. With that said, the line that removed
> > the env->gpr[1] is redudant as a few lines below in the original source
> it
> > is set with newsp. The removed line would seg fault due to trying to
> write
> > the value of env->gpr[1] into newsp, which is not valid in host.
>
> No, it's not redundant -- we must save the old value of gpr[1], exactly
> because we are about to change it (set it to newsp). The code is trying
> to do the right thing (copy the old env->gpr[1] value into the guest
> stack frame it is setting up) but in a broken way, so it must be fixed,
> not just removed.
>
> -- PMM
>

Reply via email to