On 22.12.2012, at 03:15, Scott Wood wrote: > Previously the code relied on the queue's "next" field getting > set to -1 sometime between an update to the bitmap, and the next > call to IRQ_get_next. Sometimes this happened after the update. > Sometimes it happened before the check. Sometimes it didn't happen > at all. > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com>
Have you verified that we don't run the check too often then? It's quite costly, no? Applied nevertheless to ppc-next. Alex
