On 3 January 2013 19:00, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Thanks, applied.
So we now say "char device redirected to /dev/pts/5 (compat_monitor0)" rather than "char device compat_monitor0 redirected to /dev/pts/5" ? I think that's a reduction in clarity and it's sad that we have to do it. I also think that everywhere we have something with a specific format which we're retaining for the benefit of libvirt we should have big warning comments saying "Do not change this because libvirt versions older than X.Y depend upon the exact text". Otherwise we'll just trip over the same bugs again later. -- PMM
