On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> So while I am impartial to this specific patch, some easy way to run a >> comprehensive test coverage without having to manually name each test >> using --tests= would be very handy! Something like --all-tests maybe? > > Hint from the dirty tricks department: > --tests=JeOS will do (for --type=kvm). > > Not sure how useful that actually is though, not all tests are in a good > and tested state.
Yep, there's that as well. I've fixed a lot of tests during the last weeks, but indeed some tests might be broken. > HTH, > Gerd > -- Lucas
