On 8 January 2013 16:22, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > >> On 7 January 2013 19:11, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>> I appreciate the thoroughness here but 66 patches is too much all at >>> once. Can this be done in chunks or more reasonable patch sizes? It >>> would make review and committing a lot easier. >> >> So do you have any suggestions? The patchset is long but it >> is actually in a fairly easily separable set of sections: >> > > Sounds like you have already identified how to break things up...
Well, yes, but I'm not sure it makes sense to split it into literally three different patch series, since it all looks a bit odd until you get to the end and get to see it with all the unnecessary old code removed... -- PMM