Am 04.01.2013 22:29, schrieb Hervé Poussineau:
> Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau <hpous...@reactos.org>
> ---
> include/exec/memory.h | 4 ----
> memory.c | 44 --------------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h
> index 2322732..4a757f0 100644
> --- a/include/exec/memory.h
> +++ b/include/exec/memory.h
> @@ -103,10 +103,6 @@ struct MemoryRegionOps {
> bool unaligned;
> } impl;
>
> - /* If .read and .write are not present, old_portio may be used for
> - * backwards compatibility with old portio registration
> - */
> - const MemoryRegionPortio *old_portio;
> /* If .read and .write are not present, old_mmio may be used for
> * backwards compatibility with old mmio registration
> */
Can't struct MemoryRegionPortio be removed as part of the patch?
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
