Il 16/01/2013 06:27, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Am 10.01.2013 15:40, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> virtio-s390 devices are not being reset when their bus is.  To fix
>> this, add a reset method that forwards to virtio_reset.  This is
>> only needed because of the "strange" modeling of virtio devices;
>> the ->vdev link is being handled manually rather than through qdev.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/s390-virtio-bus.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390-virtio-bus.c b/hw/s390-virtio-bus.c
>> index 7e99175..1e3e4f0 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390-virtio-bus.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390-virtio-bus.c
>> @@ -505,6 +505,13 @@ static int s390_virtio_busdev_init(DeviceState *dev)
>>      return _info->init(_dev);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void s390_virtio_busdev_reset(DeviceState *dev)
>> +{
>> +    VirtIOS390Device *_dev = (VirtIOS390Device *)dev;
> 
> Underscore alert. ;) What about naming the arg d and the variable dev?

True, but the file uses this convention throughout.

Paolo

Reply via email to