On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> wrote: > Am 17.01.2013 21:45, schrieb Blue Swirl: > >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Stefan Weil<s...@weilnetz.de> wrote: >>> >>> MinGW has no strtok_r, so we need a declaration in sysemu/os-win32.h. >>> We must also fix the include statements in util/envlist.c to include >>> that file. >>> >>> We currently don't need an implementation of strtok_r because the >>> code is compiled but not linked for MinGW. >> >> >> I think it would be better to fix the build system so that unnecessary >> files are not compiled. > > > That's what I suggested first, but keeping things simple is also > a good argument. Perhaps we should accept that libqemuutil.a > can contain some unnecessary files (that's the status quo!).
This could be related. I get build errors on OpenBSD: LINK i386-bsd-user/qemu-i386 ../libqemuutil.a(oslib-posix.o)(.text+0x540): In function `qemu_vmalloc': /src/qemu/util/oslib-posix.c:112: multiple definition of `qemu_vmalloc' bsd-user/mmap.o(.text+0x400):/src/qemu/bsd-user/mmap.c:78: first defined here /usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `qemu_vmalloc' changed from 260 in bsd-user/mmap.o to 124 in ../libqemuutil.a(oslib-posix.o) > > We also get the additional benefit of more portable code. > Even if that portability is not needed for the moment, > it might be useful later. Yes, though building as an example KVM code on Win32 may be useful one day, that day may be distant. > > Stefan >