Am 18.01.2013 17:22, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > I haven't written a testcase for it, it's tricky but should be doable. > Do you want me to respin, or can it be done as a followup?
I think I would prefer a respin, but if you think otherwise, I won't insist. > I would prefer a followup also because it will give a better pointer when > we backport this fix to the RHEL6 code. That's not really a valid argument for upstream. Also, wouldn't we backport the fixed version in the first place so that a pointer isn't even needed? This code doesn't seem to exist yet in RHEL 6. Kevin
