Am 19.01.2013 10:44, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Il 18/01/2013 17:07, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>>> Am 18.01.2013 17:05, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>>>> Il 18/01/2013 16:58, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>>>>> Avoid an undefined reference to sem_timedwait.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> include/qemu/thread-posix.h | 2 +-
>>>>> util/qemu-thread-posix.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>>> 2 Dateien geändert, 6 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 6 Zeilen entfernt(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/include/qemu/thread-posix.h b/include/qemu/thread-posix.h
>>>>> index 0f30dcc..772d925 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/qemu/thread-posix.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/qemu/thread-posix.h
>>>>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ struct QemuCond {
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> struct QemuSemaphore {
>>>>> -#if defined(__APPLE__) || defined(__NetBSD__)
>>>>> +#if defined(__APPLE__) || defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__OpenBSD__)
>>>>> pthread_mutex_t lock;
>>>>> pthread_cond_t cond;
>>>>> int count;
[...]
>>>> This was reverted recently. Apparently your OpenBSD is too old compared
>>>> to what Brad wants to support...
>>>
>>> This is 5.1 from 2012.
>>
>> 2012 does sound a bit too recent, but then maybe not considering OpenBSD
>> is only now getting a decent threading library. I suggest this
>> approach: http://lwn.net/Articles/527216/
>
> Brad, please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think OpenBSD
> supports the previous releases, only the last release (5.2 was
> released in November, 2012), -stable and -current:
> http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html
> http://www.openbsd.org/errata52.html
Forgot to reply: I upgraded to 5.2 yesterday and that did fix this issue
for me! Please drop this patch. I just need *some* working BSD system to
test bsd-user with my upcoming CPU changes.
Andreas
>
> This is a different approach to for example Ubuntu LTS, Debian stable or RHEL.
>
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>>
