Il 25/01/2013 10:23, Andreas Färber ha scritto: >> > As far as I understood, Andreas did not have any objections on the >> > contents of this patch, which doesn't make things any better or worse >> > from his point of view. > I didn't receive a patch to fix cpu.c yet so I'll do that on my own. > > Paolo, please check for any other uses of CONFIG_USER_ONLY in the files > you are moving and make sure that the respective maintainers are aware > of and understand the impact of your changes.
But I'm not moving anything! :) Not with these patches at least. Which is why I haven't sent the CONFIG_USER_ONLY patch yet. Things seem to work, have been like this for over a month, as long as we don't forget there's no hurry really. > The patches are mostly mechanical substitutions, and there is no > user-visible change---neither in total build time, nor in the files that > are linked into the executables. I did this check when I eliminated libuser, and there was none. Unfortunately, the patch that introduced CONFIG_USER_ONLY went in with the same round of merges on Dec 19. It was a merge conflict, that's it. Paolo
