Am 18.01.2008 um 15:43 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Michael Matz wrote:
But I'm not talking about the clobber list at all. I reacted to the
first mail forwarded to me, which was a question specifically about
the
hunk adding the "q" constraint, whose purpose I explained. Are you
now
also asking about the changes regarding %ecx and the clobber list?
Okay, look, I do not have enough time to fix it myself. But there
_is_ a
breakage with gcc 3.4.2 on MinGW. If that is not fixed, I will openly
oppose that patch going into CVS.
No-one was asking for a patch that breaks things to go into CVS.
Andreas