Am 15.02.2013 12:41, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 15 February 2013 11:24, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> Am 15.02.2013 03:49, schrieb Antoine Mathys: >>> First, the ds1338 code was in a poor state and never handled the 12 hour >>> clock correctly. My first patch failed to fully fix the problem so I had >>> to write a second one, but at no point did Peter or I introduce a >>> regression, quite the opposite. >> >> Read closely, I never claimed *you* introduced a regression. What I have >> rather been observing is a seemingly not-ending stream of bugfix patches > > One patch is hardly a never-ending stream!
I was referring to the previous six as well, where I first brought up the topic of qtest (before going on to implement I2C libqos after seeing another I2C'ish bugfix which did turn out to be half-broken). Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
