On 19 February 2013 15:51, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote: > On 2013-02-19 16:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> qdev_init_nofail(dev); >> d = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev); >> - sysbus_mmio_map(d, 0, 0xfec00000); >> + /* APIC overlaps the PCI window. */ >> + sysbus_mmio_map_overlap(d, 0, 0xfec00000, 1000); > > That's the IOAPIC, not the APIC. If you mean the IOAPIC, APIC and HPET > would require higher prio, too. But I suppose this is really about the > APIC and its special priority due to CPU-local access dispatching, right?
Is this a proposed minimally invasive patch for 1.4 with a different approach (possibly involving reworking things with a better managed set of container regions) for master, or is this the planned fix for master too? -- PMM