>>> On 22.02.13 at 16:37, "Hao, Xudong" <xudong....@intel.com> wrote: >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] >> And then again, wasting 4 bytes of config space on something that >> one ought to be allowed to expect to be at least 64k-aligned seems >> questionable too. hvmloader surely could align the value up to the >> next 64k boundary before writing the - then only word size - field. > Hvmloader did 64k-aligned, I'm not quite understand, could you help to point > out? > > If considering wasting of config space, actually hvmloader only write 4 > values in this register: 3.75G(0xf0000000), 3.5G(0xe0000000), 3G(0xc0000000), > 2G(0x80000000), then 1 byte is enough for xen.
I'd be fine with that too, but whether use 16M granularity here is acceptable going forward I don't know. Jan
