On 4 March 2013 19:22, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
> Am 25.02.2013 18:08, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> --- a/hw/musicpal.c
>> +++ b/hw/musicpal.c
>> @@ -1031,6 +1031,15 @@ static const TypeInfo mv88w8618_flashcfg_info = {
>>
>> #define MP_BOARD_REVISION 0x31
>>
>> +typedef struct {
>> + SysBusDevice busdev;
>
> I believe I asked for this field to be named parent_obj, is there a
> compatibility reason (macro?) to keep the old-style naming?
Apologies, you did but I missed the request when I was going back
through the mail thread for review comments on this patch. Will fix.
-- PMM
