Il 05/03/2013 00:22, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> Yes, the right thing to do would be to QOMify memory regions and >> introduce pins, but that's a bit more than the amount of time I have now >> for this. > > ...plus it means that when we do have these things we > have to go round and identify the cases where no_user > was set only because we didn't have the features before.
Yes, that's why my patch includes a comment to this end. > My attitude here really is "yes, it's not great but it's > been like this forever and we don't seem to have had a > huge flood of user complaints, so better not to mess > with it unless what you're doing is going to amount to > some kind of cleanup". I did find a complaint from a Red Hat tester about having the sysbus EHCI device in the help. I guess an alternative fix will be to move those device to a separate CONFIG_ symbol. Paolo