On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 20:45 -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > So, I think the question isn't what does real-hardware do (there's no > gain to be had in emulating all of this). Instead, I think the > question is - what makes the most sense.
Well,... what we implement for the 'native SeaBIOS on qemu' case doesn't need to work on real hardware, it's true. But a bunch of other combinations *do* need to work on real hardware, so it's worth bearing it in mind to a certain extent. We wouldn't want Coreboot and OVMF to have to have workarounds for qemu behaving differently, just because we've done something simpler for SeaBIOS. But it looks like the PAM configuration is considered part of the memory setup and isn't lost in S3, so for the case I was wondering about it's fine. Qemu *is* behaving like real hardware, which *is* the simple option that makes most sense. -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature