Il 06/03/2013 15:46, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto: >> > We could assert(!error_is_set(errp)) if we wanted. As soon as you've got >> > an Error, you must return instead of calling more functions with the >> > same error pointer. > I think Luiz would suggest (*) to receive any error into a > NULL-initialized local_err pointer; do the logic above on local_err, and > just before returning, error_propagate() it to errp. > > (*) I hope you can see what I did there: if you disagree, you get to > take that to Luiz, even though he didn't say anything. I'm getting > better at working this list! :)
I agree with Laszlo. Paolo
