Il 18/03/2013 18:38, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> On 18 March 2013 17:34, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > hw/{ => arm}/a15mpcore.c | 0
>> > hw/{ => arm}/a9mpcore.c | 0
>> > hw/{ => arm}/arm11mpcore.c | 0
> Still no.I pointed you to the list of hw/arm files I wrote the first time, where you okay-ed a*mpcore.c going in hw/arm, but you didn't answer with a better alternative... So what is the better alternative? A new hw/container/? Paolo
