There's no reason why we wouldn't want to make the cache mode
configurable.

Acked-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c |    1 +
 hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c      |    1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c
index 76bc99a..5d55a9d 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c
@@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ static Property s390_virtio_blk_properties[] = {
 #ifdef __linux__
     DEFINE_PROP_BIT("scsi", VirtIOBlkS390, blk.scsi, 0, true),
 #endif
+    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("config-wce", VirtIOBlkS390, blk.config_wce, 0, true),
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
 
diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
index fc95116..afaf348 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
@@ -762,6 +762,7 @@ static Property virtio_ccw_blk_properties[] = {
 #ifdef __linux__
     DEFINE_PROP_BIT("scsi", VirtIOBlkCcw, blk.scsi, 0, true),
 #endif
+    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("config-wce", VirtIOBlkCcw, blk.config_wce, 0, true),
     DEFINE_VIRTIO_BLK_FEATURES(VirtioCcwDevice, host_features[0]),
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
-- 
1.7.9.5


Reply via email to