There's no reason why we wouldn't want to make the cache mode configurable.
Acked-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> --- hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c | 1 + hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c index 76bc99a..5d55a9d 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c @@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ static Property s390_virtio_blk_properties[] = { #ifdef __linux__ DEFINE_PROP_BIT("scsi", VirtIOBlkS390, blk.scsi, 0, true), #endif + DEFINE_PROP_BIT("config-wce", VirtIOBlkS390, blk.config_wce, 0, true), DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(), }; diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c index fc95116..afaf348 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c +++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c @@ -762,6 +762,7 @@ static Property virtio_ccw_blk_properties[] = { #ifdef __linux__ DEFINE_PROP_BIT("scsi", VirtIOBlkCcw, blk.scsi, 0, true), #endif + DEFINE_PROP_BIT("config-wce", VirtIOBlkCcw, blk.config_wce, 0, true), DEFINE_VIRTIO_BLK_FEATURES(VirtioCcwDevice, host_features[0]), DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(), }; -- 1.7.9.5