On 4/4/13, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 4 April 2013 17:46, Artyom Tarasenko <atar4q...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >>> My point stands: >>> * -kernel (if it means anything at all) has to mean "boot in >>> the way a Linux kernel expects and defines its boot protocol" >> >> Yes. That's what happens when loading the NetBSD/sparc kernel. > > Well, that's nice, but it doesn't mean we can use -kernel to > mean "load an arbitrary binary", so at this point I have no > idea what your point is.
You were not happy about the naming. My point is the the current naming may be not that bad. -- Regards, Artyom Tarasenko linux/sparc and solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu
